CWP-21964-2022 101 IN THE KAMLESH KU CENTRAL AD CORAM: HO HO Present: M for M M for SANJEEV PR CM-1760-CWP Applic For th case is taken on Main case 1. The issu question appointm has been Tripura, Saha an 05.08.20 2022 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH SH KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEE **** Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Sr. Panel Coun Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. **** V PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) CWP-2025 Application has been filed for prepone For the reasons stated in the applicati ken on board today itself. e issue raised in the present petition estion whether the seniority is to be c pointment on regular basis or from th s been settled by a detailed judgment ipura, Agartala in case of Union of a and others, in WP(C)(CAT) N .08.2024. NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-21964-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.02.2025 . . . . Petitioners NAL AND OTHERS . . . . Respondents SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Counsel, UOI. ral) reponement of the main case. plication, the same is allowed. Main etition is no more res integra. The o be counted from the date of initial rom the date a person is confirmed, gment passed by the High Court of n of India and another vs. Biltu T) No.02 of 2024, decided on M) 2025 ners s Main The nitial med, rt of iltu on MOHIT GOYAL 2025.02.13 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21964-2022 2. The said Supreme 3. It is info Auditor by the CA 4. We, acco terms of objection 5. Writ Peti 6. All pend 13.02.2025 Mohit goyal 1. Whether 2. Whether 2022 (O&M) e said judgment was a subject ma preme Court in SLP No.12997 of 2024 is informed by learned counsel appea ditor General of India (CAG) that th the CAG on 29.01.2025. e, accordingly, expect the department ms of the letter issued by the CAG, t jection. rit Petition is disposed of in aforesaid t l pending applications also stand dispo (SANJE (ME ther speaking/reasoned? Ye ther reportable? Ye ct matter of challenge before the f 2024, and the same was dismissed. l appearing for the Comptroller and that the judgment has been accepted rtment to revise the seniority list in AG, to which the petitioner has no esaid terms. disposed of accordingly. ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the ssed. and pted ist in s no MOHIT GOYAL 2025.02.13 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document