HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32460 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. The petitioner is wife of respondent no.4 and is living separately from respondent no.4. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is being threatened by respondent no.4. 3. It is not disputed that till date marriage of petitioner and respondent no.4 has not been dissolved. If there is threat to petitioner from respondent no.4, who is husband of petitioner, she has ample remedy under the civil law as well as in criminal law. 4. In such view of the fact, we do not find any merit to entertain the present petition. 5. Accordingly, we dismiss the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. October 8, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Renu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad