Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1- 124-CRM-M-51547-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51547-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025 Gaurav Aggarwal
….Petitioner.
Versus State of Haryana
....Respondent.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Praveen Bhadu AAG, Haryana.
..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) CRM-12460-2025
Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner contends that during the pendency of the application, challan has already been presented before the learned Trial Court and as such under the instructions from his client, he be allowed to withdraw the main petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy by preponing the main case, i.e. CRM-M-51547-2024 which is already listed for hearing on 06.05.2025.
2. Learned State counsel has not disputed the said fact and has submitted that challan has been presented in this case.
3. Be it the case. Without commenting on the merits, date of hearing of the main case, i.e. CRM-M-51547-2024 which is already PREETI 2025.04.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2- 124-CRM-M-51547-2024 (O&M) listed for hearing on 06.05.2025 is preponed and the same is taken up on Board today itself. Main case
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to avail the appropriate legal remedy, as is available to the petitioner in accordance with the law.
2. In view of the aforesaid submissions, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(SANJIV BERRY) 01.04.2025
JUDGE preeti i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PREETI 2025.04.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document