Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11065 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"Issue a direction, directing the learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Hathras to decide the application 7C2 filed with the Original Suit No. 186 of 2023, i.e. Vipul Mittal Versus Harish Kumar and others; in accordance of law."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C2 Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Hathras to consider and decide the interim injunction application (7C2 Application), in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Vardhan Shastri, Kshitij Chauhan, Satya Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Vipul Mittal .....Petitioner(s) Harish Kumar Agarwal And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 16, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11065 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad