Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96673 (ALL)

MAYANK KAUSHIK v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3369/2025 · 2025-09-15

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3369 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the Additional Civil Judge(S.D.)IInd Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide the Complaint Case No. 2310 of 2024 (Mayank Kaushik Vs. Keshav) under Section 138 N.I Act, P.S. Sector 39 Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar in some stipulated period. 3. I do not find any ground to pass such order looking to the fact that number of cases are pending before the trial court waiting for its logical conclusion and in the circumstances, no such direction can be issued to decide a particular case within a stipulated time. However, it is expected that the court below shall consider and decide of the matter pending before it in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the aforesaid, the present application is finally disposed off. September 16, 2025 A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Archana Shukla, Bindu Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Mayank Kaushik .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad