HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2920 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Learned Standing Counsel submits that particulars of the disputed parcels of State land where encroachments are alleged are not disclosed in the writ petition. Moreover the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy under Section 67 of UP Revenue Code for seeking relief for eviction of such encroachment. Faced with this Shri Kripa Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the relief sought in the writ petition. The relief sought in the writ petition is accordingly declined. He recasts his relief and submits that the petitioner may be granted leave to approach the competent authority for seeking relief under the appropriate provisions of UP Revenue Code. It is always open to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings under UP Revenue Code which is a complete Code to deal with such matters for eviction of encroachment if any in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Dhananjai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shanker Mishra, Shashikant Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Amit Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad