Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9665 (CHH)

SATYANARAYAN JAISWAL @ SATYA @ BHAKA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/656/2025 · 2025-02-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9152 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 656 of 2025 Satyanarayan Jaiswal @ Satya @ Bhaka S/o Late Sukhsagar Aged About 24 Years R/o Village - Asneed, Police Station - Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House OfÏcer, Police Station - Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 21.02. 2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 16.07.2024, passed in MCRC No. 5077 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Satyanarayan Jaiswal @ Satya @ Bhaka, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if there was no legal impediment. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 3. The learned Sessions Judge, Balodabazar, District-Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 06.02.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that in this case, the examination of 15 prosecution witnesses have been completed so far. One witness, Jayram Chauhan, who was described by the prosecution as a crucial witness related to the motive, has not been able to appear due to his residence outside the State in Delhi. Furthermore, the Investigating OfÏcer's transfer to another district has left their examination pending, hence the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time therefore, he prays for grant of further more time for concluding the same. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal