Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96649 (PNJ)

SOMBIR SINGH @ SOMVIR SINGH v. ANURAG RASTOGI, IAS HOME SECY. AND ORS

COCP/3936/2024 · 2025-09-11

Alka Sarin

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3936-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.09.2025 Sombir Singh @ Somvir Singh ... Petitioner(s) Versus Anurag Rastogi, IAS and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Addl. AG Haryana. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. This is a petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of proceedings against the respondents for non- compliance of the order dated 25.04.2006 passed in CRM-M-9282-M-2006. 2. Order dated 25.04.2006 passed in CRM-M-9282-M-2006 reads as under : “Prayer in the present petition is for issuance of directions to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner, as his life and liberty is in danger. Counsel for the State of Haryana, on instructions, states that requisite security has been provided to the petitioner and shall be continued to be provided till such time the threat exists. In view of the aforementioned statement, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.” ANKUR GOYAL 2025.09.12 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment COCP-3936-2024 (O&M) --2-- 3. As per the affidavit of Sh. Arsh Verma, IPS, Superintendent of Police, Charkhi Dadri, a fresh threat assessment was carried out by the SHO, Police Station City Dadri on 15.11.2024 and it was found that there was no threat to the petitioner. It has further been stated that no fresh representation has been received from the petitioner regarding any fresh threats from the accused Vijay who is declared a proclaimed offender. 4. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off as such. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 5. Needless to say, in case the petitioner still faces any threat he would always be at liberty to avail his remedies as available in law. 11.09.2025 Ankur ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2025.09.12 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment