Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96643 (PNJ)

AMRINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/50984/2024 · 2025-09-22

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-39447-2024 and other connected matters 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 22.09.2025 1. CRM-M-39447-2025 NAVPREET SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 2. CRM-M-43096-2025 SONU .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 3. CRM-M-39274-2025 RAMESH CHAND THAKUR .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 4. CRM-M-9529-2025 RANJIT SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 5. CRM-M-39184-2025 SONU KUMAR .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 6. CRM-M-59177-2023 MANDEEP SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) KUSUM 2025.09.24 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-39447-2024 and other connected matters 2 Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 7. CRM-M-58755-2023 GURCHARAN SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 8. CRM-M-57236-2023 PARMINDER SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 9. CRM-M-50984-2024 AMRINDER SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 10. CRM-M-46958-2024 MANOHARBIR SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 11. CRM-M-42230-2024 SIMRANJIT SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 12. CRM-M-13670-2025 JORA SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) KUSUM 2025.09.24 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-39447-2024 and other connected matters 3 13. CRM-M-12950-2024 RUPINDER SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 14. CRM-M-56652-2023 GURINDERJIT SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Ishan, Advocate, Mr. Onkar Singh Batalvi, Advocate and Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Nilesh Kant, Advocate for Mr. A. S. Virk, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Lakshay Saini, Advocate for the respondents-Bank(s). **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The counsels for the petitioner(s) contend that directions be issued to the Respondent-Bank(s) not to dispossess them of the vehicles except in accordance with due process of law. The counsels for the respondents-Bank(s) at the very outset undertake that they would not dispossess the petitioner(s) of the vehicles except in accordance with due process of law. KUSUM 2025.09.24 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-39447-2024 and other connected matters 4 In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2025.09.24 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh