HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13922 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner has questioned the order passed by the disciplinary authority dated 05.12.2025. 3. Sri P. K. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection as to the maintainability of this petition as the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy of statutory appeal under the relevant Discipline and Appeal Rules. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the above fact. 5. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter. However it is provided that in the event petitioner prefers statutory appeal within four weeks from today the same shall be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Akhilesh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) considered and disposed of within a further period of two months. 6. This petition accordingly stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 13922 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad