YOGESH KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/33022/2025 · 2025-09-18
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96614 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96614 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33022 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. September 19, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Shekhar Singh, Vijay Narain, Yadvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Yogesh Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad