HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36460 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. representing State-opposite party No. 1 and perused the record on Board. 2. The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing entire criminal proceedings including the charge-sheet dated 16.12.2020 as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 03.09.2022 in Case No. 224 of 2022 (State Vs. Pammi Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 150 of 2020, under Sections 506, 323, 324, 504 and Section 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S) SC/ST Act, Police Station Mehnagar, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Azamgarh. 3. As per FIR version, named accused has allegedly assaulted the first informant (respondent No. 2) and uttered caste based slur on 03.10.2020 at about 6 p.m. In the incident in question, respondent No. 2 has sustained grievous injuries. Medico-legal report of the respondent No. 2 annexed as annexure No. 4 evinces that he has sustained six injuries. 4. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he is not pursuing the instant application on merits. He has further submitted that the present applicant is willing and ready to co-operate with the courts below and participate in the court proceedings provided some interim protection may be granted to them. It is next submitted that the present applicant has never intended to ignore the court proceedings. 5. Learned AGA has no objection if interim protection is granted to the present applicant to enable him to appear before the court below. 6. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present application, without making any observation on the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lalabahadur Yadav Alias Pammi Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that the present applicant, in case, appears/surrenders and move a bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three weeks thereafter. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant. 8. As such, instant application is finally disposed of. September 22, 2025 vinay NA528 No. 36460 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad