280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2607 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2025 Tarun Sharma ......... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present:- Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2 despite service. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present revision petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 04.10.2023, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, whereby an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., filed by the de facto complainant, was allowed in part and as a result thereof, petitioner along with his father-Ramesh and brother-Pankaj were ordered to be summoned in FIR No.651 dated 13.12.2019, under Sections 307, 323, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Sadar Ballabgarh, District Faridabad. (2) After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer, learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, wishes to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to raise his plea(s) before learned trial Court at appropriate stage(s). (3) Disposed off with liberty aforesaid. (4) It is clarified that above observations be not construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 28th April, 2025 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) Gagan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GAGANDEEP 2025.04.29 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh