APHC010107602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.754 of 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders dated 12.02.2020 passed by the Senior Civil Judge-cum- Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Gannavaram in I.A.No.13 of 2020 in O.S.No.25 of 2019 (Old O.S.No. 364/2011). Between: 1. Thotakura Krishna Kumari, W/o. Rama Mohan Rao, Hindu, aged 52 years. Housewife, R/o. Dr.No 2-70 Bahu BalendruniGudem, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Thotakura Ravindra Babu, S/o. Rama Mohan Rao, Hindu, aged 28 years. Employee, R/o. Dr.No. 2-70, Bahu Balendruni Gudem, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 3. Kuchipudi Madhavi, W/o. Peddi Raju, Hindu, aged about 27 years, R/o. Flat No. 109, 9*^ block, Prajay Apartments, Kompalli, Kutbullahpur, Ranga Reddy District. ...REVISION PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS AND 1. Thotakura Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Bushaiah, Hindu, aged 73 years, R/o. Dr.No. 2-70, Bahu Balendruni Gudem, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Thotakura Sesharatnam, W/o. Seshairi Rao, Hindu, aged 70 years, R/o. Dr.No. 2-70, Bahu Balendruni Gudem, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 3. Bandi Nageswara Rao, S/o. Late Koteswara Rao, Hindu, aged 43 years, R/o. Purushottapatnam, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 4. Kommineni Kanakadurga, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged 41 years, R/o. D.No.2-70, Purushottapatnam, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS : SRI KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010107602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Pi [3505] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 754/2020 Between: Thotakura Krishna Kumari and others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Thotakura Seshagiri Rao and others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. \ // The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the present Revision Petition does not survive. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATARAO DEPUTY REGl"STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum- Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2. One CC to Sri Kilaru Nithin Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. THREE CD COPIES TK TAC / \ ■\ \ 9 HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER CRP No.754of 2020 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS