KAMRUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA, v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/1666/2025 · 2025-03-25
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9653 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9653 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No. 1/2 GAHC010060842025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1666/2025 KAMRUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA, S/O- LATE ABDUL NOOR BARBHUIYA, VILLAGE-CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR, P.S.- ALGAPUR AND DIST- HAILAKANDI, PIN-788155. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1, PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA G-5 AND 6 SECTOR-10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075.
4:THE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD.
(NHIDCL) 3RD FLOOR PTI BULDING 4 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-01.
5:THE GENERAL MANAGER (P) PMU /SILCHAR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) PASKER LANE SONAI ROAD KANANKPUR PT-I SILCHAR-788006.
6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
Page No. 2/2 HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151.
7:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI PIN- 788151 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A Y CHOUDHURY, I HASHMI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, REVENUE,SC, NHIDC
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 26.03.2025
Heard Mr. A.Y. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. R.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL for the respondent nos. 1, 4 & 5; Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2; and Ms. S. Konwar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition in order to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant