Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96524 (ALL)

MUKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13798/2025 · 2025-09-14

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13798 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to consider the payment of subsistence allowance of petitioner for the period ranges between 29/08/2023 to 22/07/2024 forthwith and further accord the annual increment in his salary, which was due in July, 2024 and the resultant arrears may also be directed to be paid to the petitioner after revising his salary accordingly." 3. It is submitted that in the above regard petitioner has approached the authority by making representation on 24.04.2024 but no order has been passed thereupon. 4.Shri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event representation of petitioner is directed to be disposed of by the respondent in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.3 to consider and dispose of the pending representation of petitioner dated 24.04.2025 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law and by means of a reasoned and speaking order. September 15, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Mukesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad