Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96522 (PNJ)

MOHD. SAMEER ALIAS SAMEER MANSURI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/48356/2025 · 2025-09-01

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 105 MOHD. SAMEER ALIAS SAMEER MANSURI STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. instant petition has been rendered infructuous such, on account of the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 30.08.2025, which learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refute. 2. 01.09.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision MOHD. SAMEER ALIAS SAMEER MANSURI Versus STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Saroha, DAG, Haryana. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 30.08.2025, which learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refute. Ordered accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48356-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.09.2025 MOHD. SAMEER ALIAS SAMEER MANSURI ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. B.S.Saroha, DAG, Haryana. State counsel, on instructions, submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as on account of the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 30.08.2025, which learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refute. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.01 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.