Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9652 (JHR)

KAILASH STATIONERS THROUGH ONE OF ITS PARTNERS BINOD KUMAR AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION

WPC/1243/2020 · 2025-05-06

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13658-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1243 of 2020 Kailash Stationers, through one of its partners Binod Kumar Agrawal, aged about 60 years, S/o Late Om Prakash Agrawal, R/o Pustak Path, Shaheed Chowk, P.O.- G.P.O. Ranchi & P.S.- Kotwali, District - Ranchi … … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Higher Technical and Skill Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa, and District-Ranchi. 2. The Director, Higher Education, Department of Higher Technical and Skill Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O & P.S.-Doranda, and District- Ranchi. 3. The Sidhu Kanhu Murmu University, through its Registrar, Digi Campus, Dumka, P.O.,P.S. & District Dumka. 4. The Vice Chancellor, Sidhu Kanhu Murmu University, Digi Campus, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District -Dumka. 5. Shankar Traders, Shop no. 37, Opposite Pragati Medical and Research Centre, P.O., P.S. Saraidhella, District- Dhanbad. … … … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Ms. Neha Mehta, Advocate Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, Advocate For the State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For Resp. Nos. 3&4: Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate Mr. Anuj Burman, Advocate For Resp. No. 5: Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate --------- 04/Dated: 06.05.2025 Counsel for the petitioner states that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) APK/VK