IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34865 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Panchu Yachu Yadav@ Panchu Yadav S/O Nageshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Mahua Jagtpur, P.S.- Barahat, Distt-Bhagalpur At present petitioner no. 1 S.M. 1029, N-15, Killa,near telephone exchange PS-Sought West Delhi,Distt-South West Delhi 2. Sohil Yadav S/O Naro Yadav Resident of Village- Mahua Jagtpur, P.S.- Barahat, Distt-Bhagalpur 3. Maykant Yadav @ Maykant Kumar Yadav S/O Nageshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Mahua Jagtpur, P.S.- Barahat, Distt-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 110, 117(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS. 3. As per the FIR, when the informant asked the petitioners for partition of land, they abused and assaulted him with lathi. Petitioner no. 2 assaulted him on his head with lathi Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34865 of 2025(4) dt.18-11-2025 2/3 and petitioner no. 3 injured his both hands with lathi. Meanwhile, co-accused Kistu Yadav took away Rs. 1,000/- from his pocket. When the informant’s son tried to intervene, petitioner no. 1 assaulted him on his head with lathi. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are own brother of the informant whereas petitioner no. 2 is cousin brother of the informant. There is admittedly land dispute between them. The petitioners are the persons of clean antecedent. He has submitted further that one of the injuries on the hand of the informant was though grievous in nature but it was not on the vital part. The members of the defense side have also suffered injuries. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34865 of 2025(4) dt.18-11-2025 3/3 connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. kundan/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T