Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9651 (AP)

Majjiganilla Prakash v. Majjiganilla Latha

CRLP/2040/2021 · 2025-07-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010107202021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2040/2021 Between: 1. MAJJIGANILLA PRAKASH, S/O CHINNA GIRAMMA, AGE- 30 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- COMMANDANT,- CRPF, 58TH BATTALION, BHEEMAVARAM, WARANGAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. MAJJIGANILLA LATHA, W/O M.PRAKASH, HINDU, AGED- 26 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RIO 12/497, SATHYANARAYANAPETA, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the Orders dt.14-12-2020 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.47 of 2019 on the file of the Hon'ble VI Additional Sessions Judge- Anantapur at Gooty there by confirming the Orders dt.13-06-2019 passed in M.C.No.22 of 2018 on the file of The Judicial First Class Magistrate- Guntakal and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Orders dt.13-06-2019 passed in M.C.No.22 of 2018 on the file of The Judicial First Class Magistrate- Guntakal as confirmed by the Orders dt.14-12-2020 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.47 of 2019 on the file of the Hon'ble VI Additional Sessions Judge- Anantapur at Gooty pending disposal of the Quash Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER : When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ DR. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 3 134 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2040/2021 Dt. 23.07.2025 ARR