HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32124 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Jaya Agrahari, learned Advocate holding brief of learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Anamika Singh, learned counsel for respondent bank. 2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, District Mathura in Case No.2076 of 2024 (Union Bank of India v. Tahir and others). 3. At the outset, it has been stated by the petitioner that petitioner is willing to clear the entire default being claimed by the respondent bank, subject to some time being granted. 4. On the said proposal made, learned counsel for bank states, if the petitioner is to pay up the entire amount of Rs.23,80,000/- within four months, the bank would have no objection in that regard. 5. In view of such agreement being reached between the parties and in the absence of any third party rights, the writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:- (i) Rs. 23,80,000/- shall be paid within a period of six months from today such that first installment of Rs.6,00,000/- be paid on or before 31.10.2025 of the balance amount two installments of Rs.6,00,000/- each shall be paid on or before 31.12.2025 and 28.02.2026, respectively. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C. Tahir .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) (ii) Remaining amount be paid not later than 30.04.2026. 6. Further, subject to the petitioner's complying with the terms of order and paying the first installment, bank will communicate the petitioner the exact amount to be paid by way of the last installment. 7. Subject to the full compliance being made by the petitioner to the terms of this order, no other further amount can be recovered from the petitioner either towards legal expenses, recovery charges etc. as the entire amount would have been paid under directions issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and not upon coercive measures adopted against the petitioner. 8. It is made clear that in case petitioner fails to comply with the terms of this order, recovery shall stand revive from this stage, without reference to this Court. October 6, 2025 Nadeem WRIC No. 32124 of 2025 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad