IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 276 Bakshish Kaur State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 12.09.2020 and whereby recovery of Rs.26,972/ consider her claim 2. CWP-10963 21.01.2020, Annexure P enhancement of within a period of two months from that day done. Moreover, fixed by the Deputy Commissioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bakshish Kaur Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. P.S.Khurana, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Kamboj Gurpreet, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for dated 12.09.2020 and 17.12.2020, Annexure monthly salary of the petitioner has been decrea recovery of Rs.26,972/- ordered, and for her claim for enhancement of salary and payment of arrears. Learned counsel submits that in the previous litigation being 10963-2016, a direction was issued by 21.01.2020, Annexure P-5, to consider the clai enhancement of her salary/honorarium and pass an appropriate order within a period of two months from that day Moreover, she is not even being granted the wages, as has been fixed by the Deputy Commissioner, but only for IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27935-2022 (O & M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY P.S.Khurana, Advocate and Advocate, Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the orders 17.12.2020, Annexures P-7 and P-8, respectively, monthly salary of the petitioner has been decreased and ordered, and for directing the respondents to for enhancement of salary and payment of arrears. Learned counsel submits that in the previous litigation being direction was issued by this Court, vide order dated 5, to consider the claim of the petitioner for salary/honorarium and pass an appropriate order within a period of two months from that day, which till date has not been he is not even being granted the wages, as has been , but only for discharging the duties for PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.03 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-27935-2022 -2- 4 hours, though there is no condition in the appointment letter with regard to it. Recovery is also being sought to be made from her, without taking into account the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case where she is suffering from cancer, and thus prays that a sympathetic view be taken. 3. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall re-examine the matter, taking note of the afore- submissions, within a period of 4 months, uninfluenced by the orders impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to her and shall contain reasons, whereupon she shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 02.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.03 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.