SURINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CRM-M/62266/2018 · 2025-04-07
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96483 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96483 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62266-2018 Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 Surinder Kumar and others
...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Yatin Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate and Mr. Koohan Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ
, J. (ORAL)
1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC seeking quashing of DDR No.32 dated 03.02.2012 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 379/323/341/294/506/149 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Raikot, Ludhiana along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Panchayati compromise dated 29.08.2016 (Annexure P-2).
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners requested to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail an alternative remedy as available to him under the law.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 07.04.2025
JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Parveen Kumar 2025.04.09 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document