HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33241 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Lal Bahadur, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 291 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS, Police Station Seohara, District Bijnor, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant and husband of the informant are stated to have entered into an altercation during drinking of liquor on 30.07.2025 at about 10 p.m. thereby the applicant is stated to have hit husband of the informant by hoe thereby causing lacerated wound to his nose. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. 6. Learned counsel has next stated that the allegations are per se false. The FIR is delayed by about 22 hours and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. It is true that fracture of nasal bone was observed which was not dangerous to life of injured but the case is of sudden provocation as is evident from the FIR itself. 7. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lal Bahadur, Ram Sajiwan Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajpal @ Rajpal Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) languishing in jail since 01.08.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Rajpal @ Rajpal Singh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 25, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 33241 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad