IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 205-II Radhe Shyam and another Pankaj Goyal, Principal Chief Conservator Forest Van Bhavan, C CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated of this Court in CWP State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction to notices dated 17.06.2024, Annexures P taking no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwit say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain COCP-3910-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3910 of 2024 Date of decision : Radhe Shyam and another Versus Goyal, Principal Chief Conservator Forest Van Bhavan, C-18, Sector 6, Panchkula, Haryana CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Sapna Lather, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not complying the order dated 30.8.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-21291-2024 titled as “ State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction to “….respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to decide the legal notices dated 17.06.2024, Annexures P taking note of the afore-referred judgments, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwit say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3910 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-09.09.2025 …..Petitioners Goyal, Principal Chief Conservator Forest-cum-Director, 18, Sector 6, Panchkula, Haryana …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that contempt against the respondent for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Surender and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to decide the legal notices dated 17.06.2024, Annexures P-12 to P-16, expeditiously, referred judgments, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document reasons and the petitioners shall be free thereupon.” submits that since the order dated complied with and Speaking Order dated 15.11.2024 has been passed by the respondent as such. that necessary complia order dated survives in the present petition. by the learned counsel for the respondent Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper book. petitioners, the present petition is September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3910-2024 (O & M) reasons and the petitioners shall be free thereupon.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the order dated 30.8.2024 (Annexure P complied with and Speaking Order dated 15.11.2024 has been passed by the respondent-authority, the present petition may be disposed of Learned counsel for the respondent that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 15.11.2024 by the respondent survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated 15.11.2024 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners 30.8.2024 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with and Speaking Order dated 15.11.2024 has been passed authority, the present petition may be disposed of Learned counsel for the respondent-State also submits nce has been made, while passing a speaking 5.11.2024 by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause Copy of the aforesaid order dated 15.11.2024 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document