Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96468 (PNJ)

DARSHAN KAUR AND OTHERS v. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS

CWP/37771/2018 · 2025-09-02

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-37771 116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Darshan Kaur and others Chandigarh Administration and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: HARKESH MANUJA, following prayer: 2. document has been placed on record to show as to how much land was owned by deceased Sahab Singh an 37771-2018 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Darshan Kaur and others VERSUS Chandigarh Administration and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Chandail, Addl.Standing Counsel for UT Chandigarh. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition, following prayer:- “issue a writ in the nature of directing the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners submitted by them vide representations (Annexures P notice dated 02.07.2018 (Annexure P stipulated period after affording personal hearing to them.” A perusal of the record shows that not even a single document has been placed on record to show as to how much land was owned by deceased Sahab Singh an IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-37771-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 ...Petitioners Chandigarh Administration and ors. …Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate Mr. J.S. Chandail, Addl.Standing Counsel By way of present petition, petitioners have made the issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners submitted by them vide representations (Annexures P-1 & P-2) and legal 02.07.2018 (Annexure P-3) within some stipulated period after affording personal hearing to A perusal of the record shows that not even a single document has been placed on record to show as to how much land was owned by deceased Sahab Singh and out of the same how …Respondents petitioners have made the Mandamus thereby directing the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners submitted by them vide 2) and legal 3) within some stipulated period after affording personal hearing to A perusal of the record shows that not even a single document has been placed on record to show as to how much land d out of the same how SANJAY GUPTA 2025.09.02 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-37771 much was acquired on different occasions by the respondents. Neither any mutation or jamabandi been placed on record; nor even any notification reflecting acquisition having been carried out by the respo 3. petitioners and as such the present writ petition being devoid of merits is thus dismissed. 4. disposed of. 02.09.2025 sanjay 37771-2018 (O&M) [2] much was acquired on different occasions by the respondents. any mutation or jamabandi in the name of Sahab Singh has been placed on record; nor even any notification reflecting acquisition having been carried out by the respondents, has been produced. In view of the above, no case is made out in favour of the petitioners and as such the present writ petition being devoid of merits is thus dismissed. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? much was acquired on different occasions by the respondents. in the name of Sahab Singh has been placed on record; nor even any notification reflecting acquisition ndents, has been produced. In view of the above, no case is made out in favour of the petitioners and as such the present writ petition being devoid of Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No much was acquired on different occasions by the respondents. in the name of Sahab Singh has been placed on record; nor even any notification reflecting acquisition In view of the above, no case is made out in favour of the petitioners and as such the present writ petition being devoid of Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand SANJAY GUPTA 2025.09.02 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document