HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13987 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri K.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner and S/Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh and O.P. Mishra, learned advocates for respondents. 2. Petitioner has rushed this Court that duly permissible arrears towards salary after benefit granted in terms of recommendations of 6th and 7th Pay Commission has still not paid, probably on a ground that it has been sent to Office of Vidyut Nagriya Vitran Khand, Jhansi. 3. Learned advocates for respondents submit that petitioner has not made any representation or has met with concerned Authority before filing of this writ petition. 4. Learned advocates further submit that petitioner has liberty to approach concerned Authority and due payment, if still not paid, will be paid within 3 weeks from today. 5. Considering aforesaid submissions and this Court is of the view that petitioner ought to have been approached concerned Authority or respondents instead of rushing this Court by way of filing present writ petition that said Authority/respondent will be under obligation to release the dues. 6. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that petitioner will approach before concerned respondent/Authority, as the case may be, and said Authority/respondent, as the case may be, will release the dues of petitioner in accordance with law. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) September 17, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Priya Tiwari, Yogesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Om Prakash Mishra Vijay Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad