Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9646 (JHR)

SUMANTRI DEVI v. CANARA BANK THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND ORS

WPC/1591/2014 · 2025-01-29

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.1591 of 2014 ----- Sumantri Devi, W/o Vijay Kumar, R/o Mohalla-Raja Bagicha, Williams Town, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Canara Bank through its Branch Manager, Deoghar, Branch, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar. 2. The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Deoghar Branch, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar. 3. The Assistant General Manager, Canara Bank, Zonal Office, Ranchi. 4. Triloki Nath Shaw, S/o Late Govind Prasad Shaw, R/o Mahashay Bhawan, Bompass Town, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar. 5. Rakesh Jha @ Rakesh Ranjan, S/o Giyan Dutt Dwari, R/o Dukhi Sah Road, Jhounsagarhi, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : None For Res. Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate ----- Order No.24 Date: 29.01.2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. Earlier also on 8th November, 2019 when the case was called out, a prayer for adjournment was made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Since no one appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition, I see no reason to keep the same pending. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution. 4. The interim order dated 15th December, 2015 stands vacated. 5. I.A. No.13088 of 2024 also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/