SUMANTRI DEVI v. CANARA BANK THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND ORS
WPC/1591/2014 · 2025-01-29
Rajesh Shankar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9646 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9646 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.1591 of 2014 ----- Sumantri Devi, W/o Vijay Kumar, R/o Mohalla-Raja Bagicha, Williams Town, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar.
.......... Petitioner. -Versus-
1. Canara Bank through its Branch Manager, Deoghar, Branch, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar.
2. The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Deoghar Branch, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar.
3. The Assistant General Manager, Canara Bank, Zonal Office, Ranchi.
4. Triloki Nath Shaw, S/o Late Govind Prasad Shaw, R/o Mahashay Bhawan, Bompass Town, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar.
5. Rakesh Jha @ Rakesh Ranjan, S/o Giyan Dutt Dwari, R/o Dukhi Sah Road, Jhounsagarhi, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar.
.......... Respondents. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : None For Res. Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate -----
Order No.24
Date: 29.01.2025
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. Earlier also on 8th November, 2019 when the case was called out, a prayer for adjournment was made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Since no one appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition, I see no reason to keep the same pending.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution.
4. The interim order dated 15th December, 2015 stands vacated.
5. I.A. No.13088 of 2024 also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/