HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33184 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.216 of 2025, under Section 140(3) BNS, Police Station Banbhulpura, District Nainital, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Najakat Ali (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Ilma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad