147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** LPA-2614-2025 Date of Decision: 01.09.2025 PARVEEN ...APPELLANT Vs. CHANDIGARH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh Narwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Puneet Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the impugned judgment dated 29.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-10548-2024. 2. Learned Single Judge has non-suited the appellant on the ground that his age was more than the maximum age prescribed in the advertisement and the Rules. There is no factual issue on this aspect. Merely, because the appellant was inadvertently permitted to participate or re-appeared would not create any right once the eligibility itself is not fulfilled by the appellant. 3. In that view of the matter, the instant appeal is dismissed. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] JUDGE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE SEPTEMBER 01st, 2025 Rahul Joshi 1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2025.09.04 08:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD