IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 168 of 2023. Decided on : 9 th July, 2025. Ramesh Chand alias Ramesh Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. V.B. Verma, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 5. Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Dy. A.G., for respondents No.3 and 4. Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate and Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available to him in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Prayer is not opposed. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty as prayed for. In case, the petitioner avails the remedy as proposed by him, he shall be at liberty to take the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in view of the filing and pendency of the instant petition and the appropriate forum will decide such question in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 9th July, 2025. (jai) …2…