NAZIR MOHD v. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION THROUGH ITS FINANCE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
CWP/26072/2025 · 2025-09-10
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96431 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96431 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Nazir Mohd Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Himanshu
Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate,
for respondent
DEEPAK SIBAL
In the light of the fact that the original question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
September 10 vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.128
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26072 Date of Decision :
Versus
Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3-MC, Chandigarh.
*** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) In the light of the fact that the original question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Dismissed as withdrawn.
(DEEPAK SIBAL
JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
10, 2025
ther speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 26072-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.09.2025
…Petitioner
Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others
…Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Arora, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel MC, Chandigarh. In the light of the fact that the original owner of the property in question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2025.09.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document