Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96431 (PNJ)

NAZIR MOHD v. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION THROUGH ITS FINANCE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CWP/26072/2025 · 2025-09-10

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Nazir Mohd Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate, for respondent DEEPAK SIBAL In the light of the fact that the original question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. September 10 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26072 Date of Decision : Versus Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3-MC, Chandigarh. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) In the light of the fact that the original question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Dismissed as withdrawn. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 10, 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 26072-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.09.2025 …Petitioner Chandigarh Administration through its Finance Secretary and others …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Arora, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Vats, Junior Standing Counsel MC, Chandigarh. In the light of the fact that the original owner of the property in question has received the compensation for the acquired land on 26.05.2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.09.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document