Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96426 (ALL)

SANA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32658/2025 · 2025-10-07

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32658 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(A). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to provide the death compensation to the petitioner in which son of the petitioner has been died on dated 05.07.2024 due to electricity current in the field. (B). Issue any such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (C). Award the cost of the petition throughout in favour of the petitioner." 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representation to the respondent No.2 to consider her grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kant Dubey, Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent No.3-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 8, 2025 SS WRIC No. 32658 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad