Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9642 (JHR)

JILANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2173/2025 · 2025-04-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:10270] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 2173 of 2025 Jilani, Aged about 30 Years, Son of Rahmali, Resident of Village- Fusri, Karimganj, P.O.-Charhi, P.S.-Charhi, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Prasad , Adv. Mr. Prakash Sahay , Adv. For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay , Addl.PP 02 / 03.04.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 92/2024 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 190, 127, 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 191(3), 132 of the B.N.S.. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner being the member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder public servant security personnel of CCL and threatened them with dire consequences and tore their uniform. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the injuries sustained by the victim are simple in nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and he undertakes neither to go to the place of occurrence land nor will annoy or disturb the informant or any employee of the CCL in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 92 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioner neither will go to the place of occurrence land nor will annoy or disturb the informant or any employee of the CCL in any manner during pendency of the case and will co- operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-