a ,_- _ _ -` ` ` I \|||-|\J FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT.- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I IVIALLIKAR_" lhlJ I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT rr|||-A \ J -. -_ _ vc=l^MRNDkEL ==±:T==TNICNEnT.#FA.L=lEK£^R.JEU N A RA®± CRIMINAL PETITION NO.I 2253 OF 2025 +S=...i *ft# Door Betwee n : 1. Vanarchi Ananthamma, wI'fe Of late GI-ri, aged about 45 years, No.7/1155-B, Maruthi Nagar, Goofy Town Ananthapuram Djstrjct. 2. VaranchI- Mahesh, son of late G,-ri, aged about 25 years, Door No.7/1155-B, Maruthj Nagar, Goofy Town Ananthapuram District. 3. VaranchI' Gayatriu wife of varanchi Mahesh, aged about 21 years, Door No.7/1155-B, MaruthI' Nagar, Goofy Town Ananthapuram District. Petl-tioner/Accused Nos.1 to 3 AND The State of Andhra pradesh, rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court ofAP, Amaravathi, Guntur District through station House officer, Jammalamadugu police, station, visakhapatnam Respondent/complainant petition under section 483 of Cr.P.C, prayl'ng that jn the cl-rcumstances stated I'n the affidavI't filed jn support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the regular ba" applicatl-on as dismissed I'n CRL.MP.No.572 of 2025 on the file of JudI-Cial Magistrate of First Class, Jammalamadugu dated 25.02.2025 in connection with in crime No.63 of 2025 of Jammalamadugu poll-ce Statl'on, vjsakhapatnam by enlarging regular ba" to the petI|tl'Oners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 herein in crime No.63 of 2025 of Jammalainadugu police station, Kadapa DistrI'Ct. The petl'tl'on coml'ng on for hearl'ng, upon perusl'ng the petI'tjOn and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hear,'ng the arguments of srl- suDHEER KUMAR ATTALURI, Advocate for the petI'tiOners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following,I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO _CRI M I NAL PETII±Q±!J!Q±£253/2Q2! Between: Vanarchi Ananthamma and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh AND [3369] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.SUDHEER KUMAR ATTALURI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: This Criminal Petition, u/See.480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the Petitioners/Al to A3, seeking bail, in Crime No.63/2025 of J.Madugu Police Station, Y.S.R. District. 2, A case has been registered against the Petitioners for the Offence punishable u/sec. 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhl'ta, 2023. 3, Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant public prosecutor representing the respondent/State. 4. The case of the prosecution in briefiSthat: f±,Jhflr On 30.01.2025, the-~c/e facfo complainant reported that in the Premises Of Canara bank, Jammalamadugu town, some unknown offenders committed theft of bag which was containing 4 Thulas of Gold articles worth Rs.2,00,000/- of the de facfo complainant, when she went to mortgage her gold items in the above said bank. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners have been in judicial custody from o2.02.2025, by this time most of the investigation might have been completed and further detention of petitioners is not required. He further contends that the 3rd petitioner is a woman having a child of 9 months baby girl, no one is there to take care of that girl and prays to allow the criminal petition. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed tO grant bail to the petitioner. He further subm'lts that investigation is at crucial stage and the petitioners have several previous antecedents against them, 6. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on record, it is n,oticed that the learned Magistrate has not granted bail to the Petitioners On the ground that there are several cases against them. It is submitted that the 3rd petitioner is a woman aged about 21 years having a child of 9 months baby girl and no one is there to take care of that girl. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that by this time most of the investigation might have been completed pertaining to the role played by the 3rd petitioner in the present crime. It is submitted that the 3rd petitioner has permanent abode `=- `_ ` -i-_ I 3 and there I'S nO POSSibility O-i her fleeing away from justice and the release of the petitioner would not cause tampering of evidence and hampering of investigation. As such, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the 3rd petitioner. 7. In the result, the criminal petition is partly allowed with the following conditions: i. The 3rd petitioner/3rd accused herein shall be released on bail on her executing a personal bond for Rs.1O,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two (02) sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jammalamadugu; and ii. That the 3rd petitioner is directed not to hamper the investigation and tamper with the prosecution witnesses and she shall cooperate with the investigation. '"til. The Criminal Petition in respect of lSt and 2nd petitioners is dismissed. ` .SD/-G ASSISTAN //TRUE COPY// OFFICER For To, 1. The JudI'CiaI Magistrate of First class, Jammalamadugu, Kadapa i DI'StriCt 2. The Superintendent, central prison, Kadapa. 3. The S.H.O,, Jammalainadugu Police Station, Kadapa District. 4. One CC to SRI. SUDHEER KUMAR ATTALURI Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 6. One spare copy KJ ~/ \ - e+I+-i`_+I HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED..21 /03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2253 of 2025 ALLOWED )ge_€c\AL C£f; l2 4 M«R !»ife\