HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20650 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Shri Hari Om Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Janardan Prasad Patel, learned counsel for the informant-respondent no.3 and Shri Shashi Dhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 27.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0166 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS, 2023, Police Station Kaundhiyaara, District Prayagraj and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 3. Although prayer for quashing of FIR has been made but without insisting on the same only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 B.N.S.S. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017, Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Shankar Shukla, Hari Om Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nanhe Pandey And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 1147. 4. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above. September 15, 2025 Nitendra CRLP No. 20650 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Vivek Kumar Birla,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad