Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6649-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA Writ Petition (S/B) No.363 of 2020 30th July, 2025
Dhirendra Parkash
………..Petitioner Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others ...…….Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Kartikey Maulekhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Abhilasha Tomar, holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT : (per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the writ petition, a fresh advertisement was issued, application were called for and appointment has been made and, in that view, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
3.
The submission is placed on record.
4.
The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(G. NARENDAR, C. J.)
(ALOK MAHRA, J.) Dated: 30.07.2025 Mamta