1 2025:CGHC:9460 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 219 of 2025 1 - Sandeep Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Durga Prasad Rathore Aged About 32 Years, 2 - Deepak Rathore S/o Shri Durga Prasad Rathore Aged About 29 Years, Both are R/o Ward No. 16, Purana Chandniya Para Balaji Provision Store, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ms. Divya Umesh Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mr. Siddharth Komal Pardeshi Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ___________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 24/02/2025 1. The present contempt case is being preferred by the petitioners against the respondents/contemnors who have deliberately defied/violated the order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WPS No.7196/2024 and order dated 04.02.2025 passed in MCC 2 No.130/2025 in the matter of Sandeep Kumar Rathore & Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. and have thus committed contempt of this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the D.ed Certificate submitted by the petitioners is sent for verification to the Registrar, OPJS University, VPO- Rawastar Kunjla, Near Sankhu Fort, Rajgarh (Sadulpur)- Jhunjhunu Road, Churu- Rajasthan. He further contended that after verification, if the report is found legal then the petitioners will consider for counseling. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners not opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Since the submission has been made by learned counsel for the respondents that they will consider the candidature of the petitioners for the counseling after verification of the D.ed Certificate, the said submission appears to be genuine. 6. In view of the, the present contempt case stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant