Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9639 (GAU)

SATYAJIT BORAH AND 2 ORS. v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

I.A.(Civil)/810/2023 · 2025-06-22

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010058702022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/810/2023 SATYAJIT BORAH AND 2 ORS. S/O LATE JATIN BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI PO NABAJYOTI PS BORDUMSA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786152 VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD MUMBAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI 781005 2:SRI KRISHNAV BORAH S/O LATE SATYAJIT BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI PO NABAJYOTI PS BORDUMSA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786152 3:SMTI ROHINI BORAH W/O LATE JATIN BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI PO NABAJYOTI Page No.# 2/4 PS BORDUMSA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786152 In MACApp./166/2022 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT 87, MG ROAD, FORT MUMBAI AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI 781007 AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. VERSUS SATYAJIT BORAH AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE JATIN BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI, PO NABAJYOTI, PS BORDUMSA, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM, 786152 2:SRI KRISHNAV BORAH S/O LATE SATYAJIT BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI PO NABAJYOTI PS BORDUMSA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786152 3:SMTI ROHINI BORAH W/O LATE JATIN BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMALUGURI PO NABAJYOTI PS BORDUMSA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786152 4:SRI AMEN ANSARI S/O MD. NAZIMUDDIN ANSARI RESIDENT OF AT ROAD TALAP BALIBAZAR PO TALAP Page No.# 3/4 PS DOOM DOOMA DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 786156 5:SRI SUBHASH HAZARIKA S/O SRI JADUNATH HAZARIKA RESIDENT OF BORDIRAK KAKOPOTHER PO AND PS KAKOPOTHAR DIST TINSUKIA ASSAM 78615 Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. UJ Saikia Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. R Goswami B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 23.06.2025 Mr. UJ Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that taking into account that the appellant has deposited the statutory amount, he would not like to press the instant application. 2. He, however, submitted that as there is a complete stay, that too, without hearing the claimants, this Court may take up the appeal for disposal expeditiously. Page No.# 4/4 3. Taking into account the above, the instant application stands closed. 4. Registry is directed to list the appeal for hearing immediately upon completion of service upon respondent Nos.4 and 5. JUDGE Comparing Assistant