RAVI SHANKAR SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/32303/2025 · 2025-09-15
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32303 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. After arguing at some length, Sri R.K.Ojha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners made an innocuous prayer that the Assistant Registrar may be directed to consider the objection submitted by the petitioners and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties in time bound manner.
2. Learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
4. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents, I am of the view that the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to file an objection along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before the Assistant Registrar/respondent no. 2 within ten days from the date of production of certified copy of this order and thereafter the Assistant Registrar/respondent no. 2 is directed to pass an appropriate order on the objection of the petitioners in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to all affected parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ravi Shankar Sharma And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
objection.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
September 16, 2025/Pratima
WRIC No. 32303 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad