114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25436-2025 Date of Decision : 29.08.2025 KUNWAR CHANDER .....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. The main grievance which propelled the present petitioner to approach this Court by casting instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is the indolent and lackadaisical approach of the authority concerned, in not deciding his complaint dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, in case a mandamus is passed upon respondent authorities, to take a final decision on his complaint (supra), in a time bound manner. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that he has no objection, if such a direction is passed upon the respondent authorities. DHARAM VIR 2025.09.02 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25436-2025 -2- 4. In view of the above, considering the prayer, as made by learned counsel for the petitioner, being innocuous and bona fide, this Court, without observing anything on the merits of the instant case, directs respondents authorities concerned, to take a final decision on the complaint (supra), by passing a speaking order, within a period of four weeks from today. 5. Disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) August 29, 2025 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2025.09.02 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document