TARIQ AHMAD ZARGAR v. NIKEL BORKER (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/561/2022 · 2025-09-01
Mohd Yousuf Wani
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 57 Regular List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 561/2022 in[WP(C) 1935/2022] TARIQ AHMAD ZARGAR …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
NIKEL BORKER ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE O R D E R 01.09.2025
1. There has been no representation on the part of the petitioner. Same was the case on a couple of last consecutive hearings.
2. As per the Registry note, the petitioner has not even taken steps for service upon the respondents.
3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecution of the instant petition, which is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution along with the miscellaneous applications.
(MOHD YOUSUF WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 01.09.2025 ARIF