Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9633 (AP)

ANITHA CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE APGENCO

WP/5416/2025 · 2025-03-24

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010107132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5416/2025 Between: 1. ANITHA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, KATTA SUDHEER, S/O K. GANDHI, AGED49 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, FLAT. NO. 101 SRI SAI NANDANAM -1, MANIKONDA RANGA REDDY DIST, TELANGANA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE APGENCO, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA-520004. NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH POWER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED, A SUBSIDIARY OF A.P.GENCO, REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, VIDYUT SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA-520004, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR , SATARKTA BHAWAN, G.P.O COMPLEX, BLOCK A, INA,NEW DELHI- 100233. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.10.03.2025 IN I.A.NO. 02 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the tailored made tender conditions prescribed in the tender Notice No. RFx No.610001880 dt.17-02-2025issued by the 2nd respondent as being malafide to favour the contractors of their choice, illegal, arbitrary. Violates Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, apart from causing huge loss to the public exchequer and consequently as aside the tender Notice No. RFx No.610001880 dt.17- 02-2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to finalise the tenders issued vide the tender Notice No. RFx No.610001880 dt.17-02-2025 issued by the 2ndand pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that the to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No.3 in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Nagaraju Naguru,Standing Counsel For APGENCO 2. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of letter dated 21.03.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 24.03.2025 TVN 109 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.5416 OF 2025 Date: 24.03.2025 TVN