APHC010106742015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11916/2015 Between: 1. NANDIKAM NAGA LAKSHMI ALIVELU GANGABHAVANI @ BHAVANI, W/O VENKATESWARARAO AGED ABOUT 50 YRS. HINDU, BUSINESS R/O 4-2-66/3, BHUPAYYA AGRAHARAM, AMALAPURAM-533201. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. AMALAPURAM MUNCIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, AMALAPAURAM-533201. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 2nd respondent in not providing water tap connection inspite of payment of the required fee and donation vide challan No.4126, 4127 and 4128 Dt.20-2-2014 without any reason or cause and interfering with the day today life affairs of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to to provide water tap connection immediately IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 15741 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provide water tap connection immediately pending disposal of the main writ petition and grant IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 15742 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim order directing the 2nd respondent, his men and servants not to interfere with the day to day affairs of the petitioner under the guise of the pendency of the writ petitions before the Hon'ble High court pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATESWARA RAO NIMMAGADDA 2. Smt V. Sireesha Rani, MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P. No.11916 of 2015 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner(s), represented that in the light of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 8.07.2025 eha THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WP No.11916 of 2015 Date: 8.07.2025 eha U