HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32225 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Prateek Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2. This writ petition is reported to be delayed by 1461 days. 3. The petitioner by means of the present petition has challenged the order dated 11.06.2021 passed by respondent no.3, whereby the petitioner's application for mutation has been rejected. 4. A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3, that against the order impugned, there is a statutory remedy of appeal Under Section 472 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. 5. The aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. September 16, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prateek Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vijay Bahadur Maurya (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Virendra Kumar Kapoor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad