SANDEEP KUMAR @ MONU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/57436/2025 · 2026-02-10
Aaradhna Sawhney
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 963 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 963 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-57436-2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
297
CRM-M-57436-2025
Date of decision: 10.02.2026
Sandeep Kumar @ Monu and another
...Petitioners
Versus State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY
Present : Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vishal Singh, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
***** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.(ORAL)
1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No.06 dated 01.02.2022 registered under Sections 447, 506, 509, 34 IPC at Police Station City Banga, District SBS Nagar along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-2).
2.
With the intervention of respectables and elderly persons of the society, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by them. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The learned trial Court vide report dated 31.10.2025 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure.
3.
Respondents No.2 and 3 are represented by his counsel, who admits the factum of compromise. HAMANT 2026.02.12 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-57436-2025
2
4.
In view of the aforesaid report of the trial Court and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in <Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another=, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and <Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another=, (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose can be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending, since the complainant has himself compromised the dispute with the petitioners/ accused persons.
5.
In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the present petition is allowed. FIR No.06 dated 01.02.2022 registered under Sections 447, 506, 509, 34 IPC at Police Station City Banga, District SBS Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise qua the present petitioners.
(AARADHNA SAWHNEY)
JUDGE
10.02.2026 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No HAMANT 2026.02.12 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document