AKASHDEEP SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
CRM-M/48820/2025 · 2025-09-05
Namit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96267 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96267 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CRM-M-48820-2025 Date of decision : 05.09.2025 Akashdeep Singh and another ….Petitioners V/S State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. Kuljit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Adhiraj Singh, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr. P.S. Jnagal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. **** NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.116 dated 01.06.2022 registered under Sections 363 & 366-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Section 120-B of IPC was added later on) at Police Station Moti Nagar, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and order dated 16.05.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana (Annexure P-4), whereby petitioner No.1-Akashdeep Singh has been declared as proclaimed person and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 09.07.2024 (Annexure P-5) effected between the parties.
2. Earlier also, Petitioner No.1-Akashdeep Singh had filed petition bearing No.CRM-M-39450-2024 (Akashdeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab) impugning the order dated 16.05.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana, whereby he has been declared VINOD KOTHIYAL 2025.09.05 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-48820-2025 -2- as proclaimed person and the said petition was withdrawn by him, vide
order dated 17.02.2025, by stating that he shall surrender before the Trial Court. Now, the instant petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking the same relief and in addition thereto prayer has been made for quashing the FIR on the basis of compromise effected between the parties.
3. After arguing the case for sometime and realising that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn. 05.09.2025
(NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2025.09.05 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document