2025:JHHC:13681 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2111 of 2025 ---------- 1. Parimal Kundan, aged about 55 years, son of Late Suman Kumar Daradhiyar, resident of Hospital Road, Poreyahat, Godda, P.O.+P.S.- Poreyahat, District-Godda. 2. Arbind Kumar Singh, aged about 53 years, son of Dinanath Singh, resident of 168/12, Dumka Road, Poddar Nursing Home Road, P.O.+ P.S.-Pandedih, District-Jamtara. 3. Niraj Kumar, aged about 45 years, son of Dinesh Chandra Yadav, resident of College Road, Barialiganj, Pakur, P.O. + P.S.+District-Pakur. 4. Varun Kumar Tiwari, aged about 43 years, son of Vasudev Tiwari, resident of Village-Govindpur, P.O.-Itahri, Meharma, Godda, P.O.- Meharma, District-Godda. 5. Santosh Kumar, aged about 47 years, son of Uma Shankar Prasad Sharma, resident of 68, Sakragarh, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S.-Sakragarh, District-Sahebganj. 6. Amarendra Prasad, aged about 58 years, son of A.N. Prasad, resident of House no.-288, P.S.-Dumka Town, P.O.- Dumka, District- Dumka. 7. Menka Sahay @ Menaka Sahay, aged about 48 years, wife of Rajtendu Rakshit, resident of Shivpahar, Karharbil High School Road, Shivpahar, Sonwadangal, Dumka, P.O. & P.S.-Sonwadangal, District- Dumka. 8. Ejazul Hasan, aged about 47 years, son of Syed Md. Zafirul Hasan, Gali No.01, Near Eidgah, Fasiya Dangal P.O. + P.S. + District-Godda. 9. Kumar Karunesh, aged about 54 years, son of Deonandan Singh, Sahibganj College, P.O. + P.S. + District-Sahibganj. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand Through its Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand office at Project Building P.O.+ P.S. - Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi 2. Director, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand office at Project Building P.O. + P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi. 3. Vice Chancellor, Sido Kanhu Murmu University, P.O. + P.S. + Dist.- Dumka 4. Registrar, Sido Kanhu Murmu University, P.O. + P.S. + Dist.- Dumka. ………. Respondents. ---------- 2025:JHHC:13681 2 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Ms. Nirupama, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rahul Kumar, GP-II Mr. Abhilash Kumar, AC to GP-II For the S.K.M.U. : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate ------------ 02/ 06.05.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for direction upon the respondent-authority to make payment of officiating post and also for fixation of pay as per the recommendation of 5th, 6th and 7th Pay Revision Commission. The petitioners have also prayed for arrears thereof subsequent to the aforesaid calculation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though these petitioners are entitled for the claim made in this writ application, however, for the reasons best known to the official respondents, the same has not been taken care of. Accordingly, they may be directed to pass an appropriate order with regard to the claim made by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter- affidavit has been filed as such, instant writ application may be disposed of by directing the petitioners to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 2. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to treat this writ application as representation and pass an appropriate order with regard to the claim made by the petitioners by passing reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations, within a period 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. One of the petitioners is directed to serve the copy of this order along with the copy of writ application to the 2nd respondent, as early as possible. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-