HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34211 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has deposited the electricity bill raised by the respondents and the petitioner has submitted a representation before the respondent No.2 to consider his grievances but the respondent No.2 has not yet considered the same. 3. Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3 states that the grievance of the petitioner can very well be looked into by the respondent No.2. 4. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order ventilating all his grievances against the electricity bill disputed by him before the respondent No.2-Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division (EDD), Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. October 9, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Singh, Jitendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Mohd. Adil .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad