Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9624 (HP)

RAJESH KUMAR RANA v. ANOOP KUMAR

CRMPM/609/2025 · 2025-08-12

Virender Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rajesh Kumar Rana Vs Anoop Kumar Cr.MP(M) No. 609 of 2025 12.08.2025 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate for the respondent. By way of the present application, the applicant, who is complainant, in this case, has sought the indulgence of this Court to grant leave to appeal. 2. In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Criminal Appeal Nos.1868-1870 of 2025, titled as Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran & Others, there is no legal requirement for the applicant to seek the leave to appeal. 3. Application is disposed of accordingly. Cr. Appeal No._____ of 2025 4. Be registered. 5. Since, there are certain arguable points, involved in this case, as such, the present appeal is ordered to be admitted for hearing. 6. Call for the records. 7. Respondent-Anoop Kumar is directed to furnish requisite bail bonds, in the sum of Rs. 30,000/-, with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, by giving solemn undertaking to surrender before this Court or before the learned trial Court, in case, the present Criminal Appeal, preferred by the appellant, is allowed. Needful be done, within a period of four weeks, from today. 8. Let, report, regarding compliance of this order, be called for, from the learned trial Court, within six weeks. Cr. MP No.______ of 2025 Let, pleadings, in this application, be completed, within a period of four weeks. List thereafter. August 12, 2025 ( Virender Singh ) (Pramod) Judge